The graveyard
Every claim we tested, and what killed it
Each card is the author's claim next to our replication. Sources that are posts or vendors stay anonymous. Published papers are cited.
Search claims, markets or sources
All 10
No gross edge 5
Just geometry 2
Cost wall 1
Worse than buy & hold 1
Died live 1
Showing 10 of 10 studies
Died live Bitcoin · session timing
Buy bitcoin from 21:00 to 23:00 UTC, while stock exchanges are shut, every day
Source: QuantPedia (2022)
What we found
Our strongest backtest ever (deflated Sharpe 0.980). Traded forward for real: 40 trades averaging −$7.21, against +$61.62 expected. The backtest still reproduces to the cent, so it was not a data error. A great backtest is not proof.
No gross edge Gold · intraday
"CCI mean reversion on gold, London session: $10,000 → $46,519"
Source: a popular X day-trader
What we found
Before costs it earns nothing: within 0.08 points of zero in all 15 parameter settings. After costs, −0.42 points a trade at 19 trades a day.
Cost wall Nasdaq · 1-minute trend
"Dead simple NQ trend strategy: 71% winners, profit factor 3.24"
Source: a popular X day-trader (3-week backtest)
What we found
A sliver of edge before costs (+0.57bp a trade) becomes −0.57bp after them, at 816 trades a year.
Worse than buy & hold Nasdaq · 30-minute breakout
"NQ highest-close breakout with an ADX filter keeps performing year after year"
Source: an X breakout account
What we found
It makes +2.9bp a trade, but less than just holding: Sharpe 0.48 against 1.03. Being long at the same minute on random days, filter on, does as well.
Just geometry Nasdaq · opening range
"64.5% of NQ sessions break both sides of the 8–9am range, so fade to the other end"
Source: a trading-analytics vendor
What we found
True, and meaningless. With the bars shuffled into random order, both sides still get broken 69.2% of the time, against 69.4% in real data.
No gross edge Nasdaq · automated
"Automated smart-money strategy: +$34,630, then +$15,370 on a holdout"
Source: an automation vendor
What we found
+0.004R a trade before costs across 2,797 trades, and −0.039R after them. Positive in 2 of 12 years.
No gross edge Nasdaq · midday range
"Lunch-hour range: trade the sweep, enter on the gap, target the midpoint. 289 trades"
Source: an X trader, "smart-money" setup
What we found
Win rate 37.4%. Coin flips with the same stop and target score 38.2%.
Just geometry Nasdaq · first hour
"On Wednesdays, when the first-hour low forms first, the high breaks first 78.57% of the time"
Source: a trading-analytics vendor
What we found
By then price has already rallied toward the high. A random walk from the same spot reaches it first 79.7% of the time.
No gross edge DAX & Nasdaq · opening range
"Opening-range break with an EMA filter and ATR target: 83% win rate over 66 trades"
Source: a Reddit r/Daytrading post
What we found
The reading closest to the post wins 76.7% of trades and still loses before costs, Sharpe −1.72. A coin flip with the same target and stop wins 91.8%.
No gross edge US stocks · rebalancing
"Two average stocks, rebalanced daily, turned $100,000 into $7 million"
Source: Cover (1991), via a viral X video
What we found
Across 16,290 stock pairs, daily rebalancing added about 0.8bp a year over simply holding the pair. The Sharpe of that extra: 0.00.
Nothing matches that yet. Try a broader word, or send it to us to test .