The graveyard

Every claim we tested, and what killed it

Each card is the author's claim next to our replication. Sources that are posts or vendors stay anonymous. Published papers are cited.

Showing 10 of 10 studies

Died liveBitcoin · session timing

Buy bitcoin from 21:00 to 23:00 UTC, while stock exchanges are shut, every day

Source: QuantPedia (2022)
What we found

Our strongest backtest ever (deflated Sharpe 0.980). Traded forward for real: 40 trades averaging −$7.21, against +$61.62 expected. The backtest still reproduces to the cent, so it was not a data error. A great backtest is not proof.

BTC 1m backtest + 40 forward trades Write-up coming
No gross edgeGold · intraday

"CCI mean reversion on gold, London session: $10,000 → $46,519"

Source: a popular X day-trader
What we found

Before costs it earns nothing: within 0.08 points of zero in all 15 parameter settings. After costs, −0.42 points a trade at 19 trades a day.

Gold 1m · 2024–25 Read the autopsy →
Cost wallNasdaq · 1-minute trend

"Dead simple NQ trend strategy: 71% winners, profit factor 3.24"

Source: a popular X day-trader (3-week backtest)
What we found

A sliver of edge before costs (+0.57bp a trade) becomes −0.57bp after them, at 816 trades a year.

NQ 1m · 2010–21 Write-up coming
Worse than buy & holdNasdaq · 30-minute breakout

"NQ highest-close breakout with an ADX filter keeps performing year after year"

Source: an X breakout account
What we found

It makes +2.9bp a trade, but less than just holding: Sharpe 0.48 against 1.03. Being long at the same minute on random days, filter on, does as well.

NQ 30m · 2010–21 Write-up coming
Just geometryNasdaq · opening range

"64.5% of NQ sessions break both sides of the 8–9am range, so fade to the other end"

Source: a trading-analytics vendor
What we found

True, and meaningless. With the bars shuffled into random order, both sides still get broken 69.2% of the time, against 69.4% in real data.

NQ 1m · 2010–21 Write-up coming
No gross edgeNasdaq · automated

"Automated smart-money strategy: +$34,630, then +$15,370 on a holdout"

Source: an automation vendor
What we found

+0.004R a trade before costs across 2,797 trades, and −0.039R after them. Positive in 2 of 12 years.

NQ 1m · 2010–21 Write-up coming
No gross edgeNasdaq · midday range

"Lunch-hour range: trade the sweep, enter on the gap, target the midpoint. 289 trades"

Source: an X trader, "smart-money" setup
What we found

Win rate 37.4%. Coin flips with the same stop and target score 38.2%.

NQ 1m · 2010–21 Write-up coming
Just geometryNasdaq · first hour

"On Wednesdays, when the first-hour low forms first, the high breaks first 78.57% of the time"

Source: a trading-analytics vendor
What we found

By then price has already rallied toward the high. A random walk from the same spot reaches it first 79.7% of the time.

NQ 1m · 2010–22 Write-up coming
No gross edgeDAX & Nasdaq · opening range

"Opening-range break with an EMA filter and ATR target: 83% win rate over 66 trades"

Source: a Reddit r/Daytrading post
What we found

The reading closest to the post wins 76.7% of trades and still loses before costs, Sharpe −1.72. A coin flip with the same target and stop wins 91.8%.

NQ 1m · 2010–21 Write-up coming
No gross edgeUS stocks · rebalancing

"Two average stocks, rebalanced daily, turned $100,000 into $7 million"

Source: Cover (1991), via a viral X video
What we found

Across 16,290 stock pairs, daily rebalancing added about 0.8bp a year over simply holding the pair. The Sharpe of that extra: 0.00.

US stocks daily · 2010–25 Write-up coming